1 For me a reactionary appropriation of basic income by tech for precarization and against emancipation is an instance in a general account.
— Dale Carrico (@dalecarrico) November 25, 2015
2 And so, to the foregoing I append this Coda: All culture is prosthetic and all prostheses are culture.
— Dale Carrico (@dalecarrico) November 25, 2015
3 The politics of technology begins in the interested constitution & investment of the cultural field with the force of the "technological."
— Dale Carrico (@dalecarrico) November 25, 2015
4 The politics of "tech" aren't a politics of artifacts construed as agents, an alienating divestment of all but owners/designers of agency.
— Dale Carrico (@dalecarrico) November 25, 2015
5 There's no such thing as "technology": the very term a reactionary diversion from the recognition of technodevelopment as social struggle.
— Dale Carrico (@dalecarrico) November 25, 2015
6 Progress is not an indifferent accumulation of artifacts, nor is it an artifactual amplification of given capacities…
— Dale Carrico (@dalecarrico) November 25, 2015
7 …such formulations always recast progress in terms of the reactionary politics of status-quo amplification.
— Dale Carrico (@dalecarrico) November 25, 2015
8 Progress is the equitable distribution of costs, risks, & benefits of ongoing technoscientific change to the diversity of its stakeholder.
— Dale Carrico (@dalecarrico) November 25, 2015
9 Progress, so understood, is lodged in the open futurity inhering in the diversity of stakeholders to the present world.
— Dale Carrico (@dalecarrico) November 25, 2015
10 As always for me the politics of democratic futurity resist the reactionary politics of "The Futures" of incumbent-elite retro-futurists.
— Dale Carrico (@dalecarrico) November 25, 2015
No comments:
Post a Comment